tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7024052508755907865.post1674354161394135070..comments2023-04-10T12:01:00.266-04:00Comments on Lutherama: Pro - Choice MindsetDr. Luther in the 21st Centuryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07721847446086170082noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7024052508755907865.post-76203548692452977642007-06-19T08:34:00.000-04:002007-06-19T08:34:00.000-04:00Thank you for your insight.At least in your case I...Thank you for your insight.<BR/><BR/>At least in your case I can see that your mindset is based in ignorance.<BR/>At least, it is apparent that you are ignorant of embryology. <BR/>1. Embryos do not evolve. This is a misconception created in the late 19th century and early 20th century when scientists noticed that at different points the child resembled other species. They postulated that we replay evolution in our fetal development. However, with advent of genetic studies we know that this is untrue. A human fetus is human from the day of conception.<BR/><BR/>2. The embryo is not a part of the woman's body. All of its support tissues, with the exception of the uterine lining, are created and developed by the embryo. <BR/><BR/>3. Your determination of the child's inability to think is a bold one considering that from a scientific pov, we do not even have the beginnings of an understanding of how thought or will occur with in adults. <BR/><BR/>4. The embryo is not a nebulous blueprint. He or she is a living being. They may not look like you or I but that does not make he or she less of a human.<BR/><BR/>P.S. I would highly suggest that you get yourself a dictionary.Dr. Luther in the 21st Centuryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07721847446086170082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7024052508755907865.post-5074150530515185332007-06-18T14:51:00.000-04:002007-06-18T14:51:00.000-04:00Your assumtions are quite creative but please let ...Your assumtions are quite creative but please let me fill you in on the mindset of a "pro-choiser" like myself.<BR/><BR/>The embrio is part of a woman's body weather it has evolved to a fetus or not. and ontop of it being part of her body it does not have free will or the ability to play out thoughts in a mind (this is what you christians refer to as the soul) so it is in no way a person it is a blueprint or a plan of a person inside a womans body that if carried out could cause serious injury or even death. And if that woman is not planning to care and love that child she should have every right to kill that blueprint.John G Eriksonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00052384410811708488noreply@blogger.com